As I have commented before, there is no better proving grounds for EVs than Israel. No oil. Lots of cars but no great distance to travel. Intellectual and financial resources aplenty.
Agassi's project focussing on the infrastructure side with its talk of charging points and battery swapping has long struck me as interesting, well-intended, but suffering from some misconceptions endemic to those who think about this stuff but don't drive an electric car.
I've long believed the problem is lack of cars not "fuel." My first electric car was a 50 mile range 57 mph top speed Th!nk City. Not quite a real car in the conception of the average American. Not what I wanted for my next car in 2001. But I gave it a shot as by then the automakers were no longer making available the better EVs I'd come to covet. I came to realize my little Th!nk had its considerable benefits and limitations. But the problem was certainly not availability of "fuel." Electricity is ubiquitous. Even 220 volt power in a 110v world was obtainable tapping in to friends' dryer outlets.
Raising a couple of hundred million dollars not to build electric cars struck me as peculiar. But the plan is becoming clearer as at least one car maker appears to be buying in. As reported in the NY Times today here:
The idea, said Shai Agassi, 39, the software entrepreneur behind the new company, is to sell electric car transportation on the model of the cellphone. Purchasers get subsidized hardware — the car — and pay a monthly fee for expected mileage, like minutes on a cellphone plan....Renault and Nissan will provide the cars.....Mr. Agassi’s company, Project Better Place of Palo Alto, Calif., will provide the lithium-ion batteries, which will be able to go 124 miles per charge, and the infrastructure necessary to keep the cars going — whether parking meter-like plugs on city streets or service stations along highways....Where these batteries will come from hasn't been announced. But certainly if the energy storage isn't the responsibility of the automaker, the car becomes quite affordable. If Agassi has a better place to get batteries, and can leverage the investments into a profitable financing scheme for the energy, he could be on to something.
Jerusalem Post report here.
Financial Times report here.
3 comments:
Our letter in response to the Times story:
Electric Vehicle (EV) advocates are excited about Israel’s testing of EVs. Given that batteries available today are capable of 200-plus mile ranges, it makes sense to move from petroleum-based transportation to electric drive technology in a country where daily commutes rarely approach half that distance.
An experiment of this nature has been going for over five years in California, where my wife and I have been driving our freeway-capable EV since 2002. These cars, built to satisfy the state’s zero emission vehicle program, were mostly retrieved by automakers and destroyed. However, about a thousand were saved and continue to run oil- and pollution-free.
A recent survey found that 48% of these vehicle owners, ourselves included, use solar energy to charge our cars. How ideal for Israel and its abundant sunshine. Consider the savings when the millions spent for oil are used instead to install solar systems throughout Israel.
Paul Scott
Zan Dubin Scott
I'd be interested in seeing if Mr. Agassi and Project Better Place make some headway in China, as well; since the Financial Times article mentions negotiations there. Renault was one of the the first foreign car manufacturers to have a presence in China; sometimes the Chinese bureaucracy rewards such loyalty, sometimes they reward them with reverse-engineering and a homegrown version (viz-the 'Chery'). Renault's stake in a Japanese company certainly makes me think that this loyalty might be somewhat compromised.
Either way, China is also a prime proving ground for EVs for many of the same reasons Israel is...
I think Hybrids won't last as long as other cars, they are only fad and one thinks which is not good is that batteries only last a couple years.
Post a Comment